Changes Introduced by the NIS Directive 2.0
and their Potential Effect on Shaping
the Cybersecurity Labour Market
More details
Hide details
1
Warsaw University of Technology
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Publication date: 2024-05-09
Cybersecurity and Law 2024;11(1):21-38
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Ensuring cybersecurity is – next to AI development – one of humanity’s greatest challenges
nowadays. This is not a hyperbole – cybersecurity threats are real for public and private
sectors, as well as individuals. With the rapid technological advancements and galloping
digitisation, malicious entities and individuals are looking to take advantage of the online
security gaps created by lack of caution. The European Union tried to counteract this
by extensively discussing the issue, giving rise to the NIS directive. After a few years in
force, its effects were assessed, and several changes were prepared to improve overall
cybersecurity. However, these solutions will not work unless it becomes standard practice
to employ cybersecurity specialists in a wide range of environments, extending far beyond
those of the biggest organisations. This is what happened in the case of the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR). The original provisions had been expanded to such an
extent that they led to the emergence (separation) of an independent consultancy market
in the field of information protection, with particular emphasis on personal data from the
technical and legal consultancy markets. Hence, comparisons to the GDPR are valid. In
this article, the authors review and assess the changes in cybersecurity legislation. This
includes the NIS 2.0 directive category of digital service providers and their expected
effects on the labour market.
REFERENCES (10)
2.
Lucini V., The ever-increasing cybersecurity compliance in Europe: The NIS 2 and what all businesses in the EU should be aware of, „Russian Law Journal” 2023, vol. 11, no. 6.
6.
Porzeżyński M., Cyberbezpieczeństwo dostawców usług cyfrowych, Warszawa 2021.
8.
Ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa. Komentarz, eds. W. Kitler, J. Taczkowska-Olszewska, F. Radoniewicz, Warszawa 2019.
9.
Wpływ skutków pandemii koronawirusa na potrzeby kompetencyjne sektorów informatyki oraz telekomunikacji i cyberbezpieczeństwa w konsekwencji rozwoju zastosowań technologii cyfrowych oraz kształtowania się nowego modelu pracy – kwiecień 2023,
https://antal.pl/wiedza/raport... [access: 15.06.2023].
10.
Zalcewicz A. New Technologies in the Control of Public Finances and Building Public Confidence in the State, „Bialystok Legal Studies” 2023, vol. 28, no. 2.