The aim of the article is linguistic and semantic analysis of concepts such as armed conflict, war, civil war and coup d’etat. In the author’s opinion, these concepts do not coincide, and their correct classification will lead to a better understanding of the nature of international
conflicts. Authors also draws attention to the need for cooperation between scientists and politicians in the aspect of greater effectiveness of international humanitarian law.
Muntarbhorn V., Legal Qualification and International Humanitarian Law as “lex specialis”: 10 Basic Questions Concerning International Armed Conflicts... and answers? [in:] Current Problems of Humanitarian Law, Sanremo 2003.
Picted J.S. (ed.), Commentary: I Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition Of the Wounded Sick In Armed Forces in the Field 32, Geneva 1952.
Schmitt M.N., Marshall G.C., Garraway C.H.B., Dinstein Y., The Manual on the Law of Noninternational Armed Conflict, International Institute of Humanitarian Law, Sanremo 2006.
Stewart G.S., Towards a single definition of armed conflict in international humanitarian law: A critique of internationalized armed conflict, “International Review of the Red Cross” 2003, no. 850.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.