Cybersecurity in Hungary and Poland. Military aspects
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Law, Eötvös Lóránd University, Hungary
2
Chair of Administrative Law and Security Studies, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Publication date: 2023-02-20
Cybersecurity and Law 2023;9(1):82-94
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, ensuring cybersecurity is an important objective of public authority.
It must take into account the protection of cybersecurity, both in the current and
future perspectives. The state security policy must also take into account its dimension
in cyberspace, especially today, where many services are provided through communication
and information systems.
A special place in the cybersecurity system is given to cyberspace security in the
military dimension. In this regard, both the military administration and civil law entities,
both acting for defence, will be competent. Effective military operations are directly
linked to new digital technologies. As a result, for the sake of state security (both internal
and external), it becomes necessary not only to respond to cyberattacks, but also
to counteract them.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz K., Karpiuk M., Kostrubiec J., The legal status of public entities in the field of cybersecurity in Poland, Maribor 2021.
3.
Czuryk M., Cybersecurity as a premise to introduce a state of exception, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2021, no. 2.
4.
Czuryk M., Restrictions on the Exercising of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms Due to Cybersecurity Issues, „Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2022, no. 3.
5.
Czuryk M., Special rules of remuneration for individuals performing cybersecurity tasks, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2022, no. 2.
6.
Czuryk M., Supporting the development of telecommunications services and networks through local and regional government bodies, and cybersecurity, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2019, no. 2.
7.
Fekete-Krydis K., Lázár B., Military Defence, „Review” 2020, no. 3.
9.
Hoffman I., Cseh K.B., E-administration, cybersecurity and municipalities – the challenges of cybersecurity issues for the municipalities in Hungary, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2020, no. 2.
10.
Hoffman I., Karpiuk M., The local self-government’s place in the cybersecurity domain. Examples of Poland and Hungary, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2022, no. 1.
11.
Kaczmarek K., Zapobieganie zagrożeniom cyfrowym na przykładzie Republiki Estońskiej i Republiki Finlandii, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2019, no. 1.
12.
Karpiuk M., Activities of local government units in the scope of telecommunication, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2019, no. 1.
13.
Karpiuk M., Cybersecurity as an element in the planning activities of public administration, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2021, no. 1.
14.
Karpiuk M., Prezydent Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej jako organ stojący na straży bezpieczeństwa państwa, „Zeszyty Naukowe AON” 2009, no. 3.
15.
Karpiuk M., Tasks of the Minister of National Defence in the area of cybersecurity, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2022, no. 1.
16.
Karpiuk M., The obligations of public entities within the national cybersecurity system, „Cybersecurity and Law” 2020, no. 2.
17.
Karpiuk M., The Protection of State Security in Cyberspace as a Justifying Ground for Restricting Constitutional Freedoms and Rights, „Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego” 2022, no. 3.
18.
Kołodziejczak M., Funkcjonowanie Naczelnego Dowódcy Sił Zbrojnych w Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Warszawa 2020.
19.
Krasznay C., Muha L., Cyber defence in Hungary: a blessing or a curse?, „HWSW Online IT News Magazine” 2013, no. 3.
20.
Pizło W., Management in Cyberspace: From Firewall to Zero Trust [in:] The Public Dimension of Cybersecurity, eds. M. Karpiuk, J. Kostrubiec, Maribor 2022.
21.
Tóth A., Resolutions and agreements following the Prague NATO Summit on the modernisation of the command and control system and the development of joint operational capability, „Hadmérnök” 2016, no. 3.
22.
Tóth T., Introducing the NATO Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, „National Security Review” 2018, no. 4.