Korzystanie przez biegłego
podczas sporządzania opinii
z oprogramowania, do którego
nie posiada licencji. Glosa od wyroku
Sądu Apelacyjnego w Łodzi
z 1 marca 2022 roku, II AKa 340/21
Scientific and technological progress and the development of computer and cybersecurity
science provide substantial evidence-collection possibilities in criminal proceedings.
Law-enforcement authorities, courts, trial participants and expert witnesses should be
aware of such possibilities. Expert witnesses should be required to provide information
on whether given computer software used by a given expert witness as support for the
preparation of opinions is covered by a licence and whether the software has been
approved by the manufacturer, as the use of unapproved software might generate errors.
The expert witness’s use of fake software disqualifies a given opinion, as has been proven
in this gloss.
REFERENCES(7)
1.
Doda Z., Glosa do wyroku SN z dnia 1 września 1975 r. (Z 24/75), „Państwo i Prawo” 1977, nr 3.
Pawelec K.J., The use of cybersecurity-specific rescarch methods of identify behaviours preceding dangerous traffic situations [w:] The public dimension of cyberseccurity, red. M. Karpiuk, J. Kostrubiec, Maribor 2022.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.